Private Hard Money Lender in California, Texas and Arizona: States are suing federal regulators: What is the future for Fin-tech?

Featured Post

The Big Show is Coming to Town.

Don’t do it…it’s a big mistake flipping homes can cost you a lot of money . Every week the house flipping circus comes to town and adve...

Saturday, September 23, 2017

States are suing federal regulators: What is the future for Fin-tech?


approved for hard money loanThe Office of the Comptroller of Currency is being sued by state regulatory agencies for its efforts to provide special charters to non-bank alternative lenders. The future of non-bank commercial lending remains uncertain. As competing regulatory interests squabble, consumers are still left without basic protections.

States regulators, under the banner of the Conference of State Bank Supervisors, are suing the Office of the Comptroller of Currency (OCC) over the agencies proposal to issue special bank charters to non-bank alternative lenders. Opponents of the OCC’s efforts claim that under the National Banking Act, the OCC can only charter traditional depository institutions. John Ryan head of the CSBS claims, “ If the OCC is allowed to proceed with the creation of a special purpose nonbank charter, it will set a dangerous precedent that any federal agency can act beyond the legal limits of its authority.” Applicants for the OCC charter would need to meet the similar standards as traditional banks in terms of capital, liquidity, governance and regulatory compliance. The charter would label alternative lenders who qualify as special purpose banks, putting them under the same regulatory purview as traditional banks. States see the OCC’s proposal as a direct threat to their authority to regulate alternative lenders.

The issue comes down to the apparent need for a uniform regulatory frame-work for non-bank lenders. The OCC claims offering the charter is just the first step in efforts to encourage responsible innovation and to protect consumers in the growing alternative lending industry. The special charter would be optional and a way for alternative lenders to distinguish themselves from the competition. Securing a charter could allow qualified lenders to skip the state-by-state licensing process currently in place. State regulators argue that existing frame-work has worked thus far and that states are in a better position to regulate the growing industry. According to Ryan, "State regulators already supervise a vibrant financial services marketplace that includes non-banks and banks. That regulatory structure has produced a robust platform for innovation.

This debate illustrates just how far behind US regulators

are when it comes to the Fin-Tech industry.

The OCC’s proposal is merely first step to provide a uniform set of regulations for the alternative lending industry. Similar frameworks already exist in places like Hong Kong and the UK. These countries were able to take preemptive steps to protect consumers. In the US creating a consistent set of regulations is far more difficult because there are so many overlapping interests. But the lawsuit and the debate over state vs federal authority, should be settled in order to protect consumers and the industry as a whole. Going forward a uniform, but adaptive regulatory frame work is needed. The OCC should lauded for taking tentative steps in this direction.

While regulators squabble over who can regulate alternative lenders, consumers lack basic protections.

Basic consumer protections are needed in the Fin-Tech industry. State and federal regulators should stop sparring with one another and take concrete steps to establish a sensible set of rules under which alternative lenders can operate. The OCC efforts to give consistency through a standardized charter is an encouraging first step in this direction. Good regulation in the future would recognize the diversity within the industry as a whole, adapt as the market changes and not place an overwhelming burden on start-up lenders. The federal government and states need to work with one another, to protect consumers rather than engaging in pointless turf-wars.

Dennis-Dahlberg-Mortgage-Broker-1_th

Dennis Dahlberg
Broker/RI/CEO/MLO
Level 4 Funding LLC  Private Hard Money Lender
Arizona Tel:  (623) 582-4444
Texas Tel:      (512) 516-1177
Dennis@level4funding.com NMLS 1057378 | AZMB 0923961 | MLO 1057378
22601 N 19th Ave Suite 112 | Phoenix | AZ | 85027
111 Congress Ave |Austin | Texas | 78701
clip_image002clip_image004clip_image006clip_image008

About the Author:  Dennis has been working in the real estate industry in some capacity for the last 40 years. He purchased his first property when he was just 18 years old. He quickly learned about the amazing investment opportunities provided by trust deed investing and hard money loans. His desire to help others make money in real estate investing led him to specialize in alternative funding for real estate investors who may have trouble getting a traditional bank loan. Dennis is passionate about alternative funding sources and sharing his knowledge with others to help make their dreams come true. Dennis has been married to his wonderful wife for 42 years. They have 2 beautiful daughters 5 amazing grandchildren. Dennis has been an Arizona resident for the past 40 years.

Technorati Tags: commercial loans,commercial lending,commercial mortgage